Chapter 2 is about using technology to give students feedback on their work. I enjoyed this chapter.
I especially liked the idea of using the word processing application to add comments to the students' writings. I must confess that I did not realize I had this capability on my software. I will definitely use this for my independent study student this coming year. He will be studying literature and writing plenty of essays for me. He will have a computer in my room, I'll just have to get him a gaggle e-mail account if he doesn't have one already. I will enjoy using this tool - most of the time there is not enough space for me to write my comments on the student papers. Also my handwriting can get a little sloppy so my student should appreciate this tool as well, so he will truly be able to read my comments now. I am excited about this. However, I do not anticipate using this on a large scale. I imagine the logistics of getting all of my students to a computer with an e-mail (or some kind of removable storage device) would just be too complicated at this point. I will use it with my literature student this year. I expect to increase usage after honing my skills on it.
I like the classroom response system, too. The authors are a little defensive about using multiple choice questions. They remind us that we can use multiple-choice questions to evaluate all levels of skills on Bloom's taxonomy. I had to laugh when I read that because I so totally agree with them. I mean really, a good question is a good question. I know that there is at least one of these at my school - I think it belongs to the social studies department. I do have a couple of concerns though. What should my pace be when I'm using this? I want to make sure everybody answers in a timely matter, but at the same time not cause anxiety either. Initially I was thinking that the students would be seeing the questions for the first time whenever I use this software. That made me think about wait time and there's no way everybody in the class is going to get an answer in the same three first seconds of seeing the question. And I imaged some of the students simply shouting out the answers to their friends across the room, which wouldn't do me any good as an evaluation tool. But then I read something Nancy wrote about using it to check homework. Now, that makes sense, the students could have a paper in front of them with their answers already filled out. They would simply use the software to submit their work so it would be graded quickly. I can easily see myself using this software, just as long as I can wrestle it out of the other department.
The grading software for essays intrigues me. But I don't know how much I would trust it. Perhaps the software would look for certain key words or phrases and organizational words and structure. We would have to make sure the software was clued into the vocabulary of the subject area. I wonder if the software exists in Spanish.
I like the idea of using Web resources for online quizzes and games. Again the book takes time to remind us that a good game can be educational as well as entertaining - preaching to the choir! I am thankful that the district was able to purchase Rosetta Stone for my students to use - special thanks to my Assistant Principal for this. Since I have four student computers in my classroom my students rotate in and out of them depending on the day. My students need to spend a certain amount of time on the program each grading period but they do work at their own pace. I would like to add online quizzes for my students to do. I have looked for some, but so far I haven't been able to find good ones that are free. I do have my students doing some of these things with the software and on-line activities from the textbook company. The students do seem pretty engaged and concentrated while they're doing these activities.
I like the idea of a classroom blog. Many of my students are surfing the web at their houses so why not read and comment on the class's blog in the meanwhile. Or of course they could read the blog using one of the computers in class. But it does sound like a lot of monitoring. I would require them to use their real names in their postings, hoping no one goes in under a classmate's name.
I also like the video conference software as a classroom tool. My class is a language class and my students do need to experience authentic use of the target language. I would like to look into this more.